Decision Year: 2020
Aguilar v. State of Idaho, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund
This matter came before the Commission on remand from a decision of the Idaho Supreme Court issued March 14, 2019.
Read Full ArticleTenny v. Loomis Armored (Reconsideration)
On December 27, 2019, Defendants filed a timely motion for reconsideration with supporting brief.
Read Full ArticleBankston v. TJT
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-717, Referee Brian Harper submitted the record in the above entitled matter, together with his recommended findings of fact and conclusion of law, to the members of the Idaho Industrial Commission for their review.
Read Full ArticleRansom v. Atlas Bar
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee John C. Hummel, who conducted a hearing in Boise on November 6, 2019.
Read Full ArticleSmith v. Complete Air Mechanical
pursuant to Idaho Code $ 72-506, this matter was originally assigned to Referee Alan Taylor. He disqualified himself by order dated May 23, 2019.
Read Full ArticleSmith v. Complete Air Mechanical Erratum
On March 30,Z121,the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order were filed by the Commission in the above-entitled case
Read Full ArticleStansell v. Fred Meyer
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above-entitled matter to Referee Michael Powers, who conducted a hearing in Boise on August 21, 2018.
Read Full ArticleDixon V. Deloe Priddy Tree & Stump Service
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Brian Harper, who conducted a hearing in Boise, Idaho, on December 5, 2019.
Read Full ArticleDavis v. Edgewood Spring Creek Soda Springs, LLC
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Brian Harper, who conducted a hearing in Pocatello, Idaho, on July 8, 2019.
Read Full ArticleRivera v. Express Services (Dec Ruling)
Around October 2019, Petitioner and Respondent Employer/Surety submitted a proposed lump sum settlement agreement for the Commission’s consideration. Based on the parties’ documentation, there was an unresolved claim by the Canyon County Indigent Fund against the settlement proceeds.
Read Full Article