Decision Month: August
Ish v. In & Out Painting
On August 6, 2019, Claimant contacted Commission staff and requested an addendum to the parties’ July 17, 2019 lump sum settlement.
Read Full ArticlePalmer v. Engineered Structures
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Mike Powers, who conducted a hearing in Boise on September 20, 2018.
Read Full ArticleSchmitt v. Eagle Rock Timbers
This Petition for Declaratory Ruling arises from a work-related accident leading to the death of Werner Schmitt (“Decedent” herein) on November 1, 2016.
Read Full ArticleMacia v. Wabtec
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee John C. Hummel, who conducted a hearing in Boise on October 13, 2017.
Read Full ArticleHackman v. CHS
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee John C. Hummel, who conducted an emergency hearing in Pocatello on February 22, 2018.
Read Full ArticleSchild v. Buck Knives
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Michael E. Powers.
Read Full ArticleTeachout v. Stryker Corporation
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Michael E. Powers who conducted a hearing in Boise on October 25, 2017.
Read Full ArticleRangel v. Sorrento Lactalis
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Brian Harper, who conducted a hearing in Boise, Idaho, on December 5, 2017.
Read Full ArticleReimer V. Overland West
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Alan Taylor, who conducted a hearing in Twin Falls on June 20, 2017.
Read Full ArticleGary Brown v Home Depot
On March 15, 2017, Defendants filed a request for declaratory ruling with supporting memorandum. Defendants argue that Corgatelli v. Steel West, 157 Idaho 287, 335 P.3d 1150 (2014) cannot be applied retroactively under Davis v. Hammack Mgmt., 161 Idaho 791, 391 P.3d 1261 (2017), to void the PPI credit given to Defendants, and that Claimant cannot reopen the Commission’s final April 26, 2013 Decision with a demand to pay an additional award of permanent physical disability (PPD).
Read Full Article