Doc Status: Archived
Campagni v. The Walt Disney Company, dba The Disney Store and Hoop Retail Stores LLC, dba The Disney Store
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Industrial Commission assigned this matter to Referee Michael E. Powers, who conducted the hearing in Boise, Idaho, on July 29, 2011 for one full day, and on August 12, 2011, for one half day.
Read Full ArticleCorgatelli v. Steel West, Inc. – Order to Clarify
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-718, Defendants Employer and Surety (“Defendants”) move for reconsideration or clarification of the Commission’s July 26, 2012 decision in the abovecaptioned case.
Read Full ArticleGardner v. Magic Valley Business Systems
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the above-entitled matter was assigned to Referee LaDawn Marsters, who conducted a hearing on June 1, 2012 in Twin Falls, Idaho. Claimant was present in person and represented by Patrick D. Brown of Twin Falls.
Read Full ArticleIdaho Industrial Commission v. T.H.E. Insurance Company – Show Cause Order
By Order dated January 31, 2013, T.H.E. Insurance Company (“T.H.E.”) was ordered to appear before the Idaho Industrial Commission (“Commission”) to show cause why the Commission should not:
Read Full ArticleKrdzalic v. Jayco, Inc.
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Rinda Just, who conducted a hearing in Twin Falls, Idaho, on November 15, 2012.
Read Full ArticleBaez-Alicea v. Taylor Brothers, Inc.
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Rinda Just, who conducted a hearing in Boise, Idaho, on August 1, 2012.
Read Full ArticleCampagni v. The Walt Disney Company
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Industrial Commission assigned this matter to Referee Michael E. Powers, who conducted the hearing in Boise, Idaho, on July 29, 2011 for one full day, and on August 12, 2011, for one half day.
Read Full ArticleFomichev v. Lynch – Order on Reconsideration
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-718, Defendants moved for reconsideration of the Commission’s decision in the above-captioned case. Defendants argue that Idaho Code § 72-435 does not require a Commission order before defendants may suspend workers’ compensation benefits due to a claimant’s injurious practices, and that the Commission’s holding is impractical.
Read Full ArticleGerdon v. Con Paulos, Inc. – Order Denying Reconsideration
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-718, Claimant moves for reconsideration of the Commission’s October 15, 2012 decision in the above-captioned case. Claimant argues that the Commission’s findings on Claimant’s disability rating are not supported by substantial and competent evidence.
Read Full ArticleHope v. State of Idaho, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund – Order Denying Reconsideration
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-718, Claimant moves for reconsideration of the Commission’s October 26, 2012 decision in the above-captioned case. In the decision, the Commission found that Claimant failed to prove that the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF) bears liability on this claim.
Read Full Article