Doc Status: Archived
Wilson v. Seapac of Idaho
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Rinda Just, to whom this matter was submitted for decision, in lieu of hearing, by stipulation of the parties.
Read Full ArticleBrown v. Meadow Gold Dairies
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Rinda Just, who conducted a hearing in Boise, Idaho, on October 21, 2010.
Read Full ArticleGodfrey v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
The Commission issued its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order on April 20, 2011. On April 26, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Reconsider. On June 2, 2011, Claimant filed Claimant’s Memorandum Opposing Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider.
Read Full ArticleGrawcock v. State of Idaho, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund
On May 16, 2011, Claimant filed a Motion for Reconsideration with Supporting Brief pertaining to the Industrial Commission’s decision filed April 22, 2011, in the above referenced case. Defendant, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF), filed a response on May 25, 2011. No reply was filed.
Read Full ArticleVoglewede w. Fair Dinkum Genuine Company
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Alan Taylor, who conducted a hearing in Lewiston on October 1, 2010. Claimant, Corrine R. Voglewede, was present in person and represented by Michael T. Kessinger, of Lewiston.
Read Full ArticleYost v. Community Council of Idaho, Inc.
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above entitled matter to Referee Rinda R. Just, who conducted a hearing in Boise on April 19, 2011. The pro se Claimant did not appear and participate in the hearing.
Read Full ArticleZielenski v. U.S. Cricis, Inc., an Ohiho Corporation, successor to A & V Acquisitions, Inc., an Ohio Corporation
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned this matter to Referee Douglas A. Donohue. He conducted a hearing in Boise on September 21, 2010. Brad Eidam represented Claimant.
Read Full ArticleFederko v. Sun Valley Company, ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-718, Claimant moves for reconsideration of the Commission’s decision in the above-captioned case. Claimant argues that Defendant waived its notice defense and should be estopped from asserting the defense.
Read Full ArticleFerrin v. Bechtel Bettis, inc., ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-718, Defendants move for reconsideration of the Commission’s decision in the above-captioned case. Defendants argue that Claimant should not be entitled to medical care benefits, as Claimant’s medical care has already been covered through Claimant’s health insurance provider.
Read Full ArticleGomez v. Dura Mark, Inc., ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION
On February 11, 2011, Claimant filed a motion for reconsideration of the Commission’s order in the underlying case, and attached a supporting affidavit from Claimant’s attorney. The Commission found that Claimant had failed to prove that the medical treatment she received after Dr. Simon’s February 16, 2010, IME is related to her industrial accident and injury, and that all other issues were moot.
Read Full Article